Board provides update on 2026 committee elections
May 15, 2026
Intersect’s recent statement provides an update on the April 2026 Committee Elections, focusing on the review and actions taken in response to irregular voting patterns discovered during the post-election analysis. The review identified a concentrated pattern of coordinated voting activity linked to a group of new memberships and a small number of payment cards. These patterns influenced candidate rankings in multiple committees, prompting the need for intervention to maintain confidence in the election outcome.
The actions taken were not based on speculation but were the result of thorough analysis and independent review. Intersect’s primary goal throughout this process is to uphold the integrity and legitimacy of the election process while ensuring affected members are treated fairly and given an opportunity to provide additional information for review.
Affected members will receive information on the review and reinstatement process, allowing them to explain their account creation, participation intent, and verify their identity. Reviews will be conducted on a case-by-case basis to determine outcomes. No further action has been taken regarding elected candidates beyond what has already been communicated publicly.
Intersect is also conducting a broader review to strengthen future election processes, focusing on clearer membership and verification requirements, robust participation pathways, proactive monitoring tools, and process refinements based on lessons learned from the recent election cycle.
It is important to clarify that the temporary suspensions imposed were administrative measures to allow for further review and verification without publicly alleging fraud or intentional wrongdoing against specific individuals. The review considered various membership and election obligations, including the principle of one member, one vote, fair participation requirements, restrictions on membership transfer, and compliance with Intersect’s terms and Code of Conduct.
The recent elections marked the first under a new two-year term structure, with over 100 candidates vying for spots across eight committees and nearly 4,000 member votes cast. While areas for improvement were identified, the process highlighted the need for transparent oversight, independent auditing, and defined governance processes as participation in Cardano governance evolves.
As discussions and interpretations circulate within the community, Intersect acknowledges the challenges faced by members, candidates, and committees. The organization aims to balance transparency with fairness, confidentiality, and procedural responsibility, ensuring communications are based on verified information rather than speculation. Intersect refrains from attributing intent or misconduct to individuals until review processes are complete.
Members directly affected will be contacted, independent reviews will be conducted, and governance bodies will be involved in the ongoing process. Some aspects of the review may involve legal, privacy, and procedural considerations that limit public discussion in real-time. Updates will be provided as processes conclude, with a commitment to fair and factual communication for all parties involved.
